Predictors associated with inappropriate transport of near shore spinal injuries / 中华创伤杂志(英文版)

PURPOSE@#Spinal injuries resulting in neurological damage cause significant morbidity. Swift neurosurgical intervention can mitigate negative outcomes. However, variable mechanisms of injury may be associated with inappropriate transport (IAT), which may delay necessary surgical interventions. Patients with near shore spinal injuries (NSSI) presented with unique mechanisms, so we investigated factors associated with IAT in patients with NSSI.@*METHODS@#We performed a multicenter retrospective study of all adult patients transported from a beach resort to 3 hospitals for suspected NSSI between 2006 - 2017. We excluded patients transferred to other facilities, and those not injured in the water. Primary outcome was IAT, defined as patients with NSSI requiring transfer to another trauma center. To avoid heterogeneity in our analysis, we further excluded patients without NSSI who were inappropriately transported to a level I trauma center. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess association of independent variables (such as demographic, environmental, and clinical factors) with outcome.@*RESULTS@#We analyzed 278 patients with suspected NSSI, and found 14 (5.0%) had IAT. Compared to appropriately transported patients, diving was associated with higher percentages of IAT (28.6% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.014) and more were transported by air (50.0% vs. 20.6%, p = 0.01). In multivariable regression, patients' oxygenation saturation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.8, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 077-0.98) and diving (OR = 7.5, 95% CI: 1.2-46) were significantly associated with IAT.@*CONCLUSION@#Rate of IAT for patients with NSSI was low. However, first responders and emergency medicine providers should be aware that diving is associated with a higher likelihood of IAT.

Outcome predictors for severely brain-injured patients directly admitted or transferred from emergency departments to a trauma center / 世界急诊医学杂志（英文）

@#Dear editor, After sustaining severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), patients frequently require invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). However, up to 26% of patients require tracheostomy due to failure to wean from the ventilator.[1] The decision of when to perform tracheostomy is important as it balances the risk between avoiding prolonged MV and avoiding risk of tracheostomy. Early predictors for tracheostomy, i.e., clinical factors when patients first present to an Emergency Department after trauma or when patient first arrive at a regional trauma center, can help clinicians’ medical decision-making process.